Illinois DUI Lawyer Blawg

Published on: December 14, 2012

Is DUI court different from a driver’s license suspension hearing at the Illinois Secretary of State?

A charge of Driving Under the Influence (DUI or drunk driving) is considered an offense against the people of the state of Illinois. In other words, it is a crime. 625 ILCS 5/11-501

A person charged with a crime must respond to the charges in a court of law. Because the consequences of a DUI conviction include fines and even possible incarceration (jail) (730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-5.5), in the United States, the accused does not have to prove his innocence. Rather, the state has the burden of proving the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant is also entitled to a trial by jury, to review, in advance, the evidence the state intends to present against him, and the right to appeal any conviction. You cannot be forced to testify, and if you are found not guilty, the state may not try you again (double jeopardy) Finally, the accused is afforded certain Constitutional protections against violations of his rights, primarily under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

As a result of these protections, especially the requirement that the accused is not required to prove anything, it is to a DUI defendant’s benefit to downplay any actions that might reflect negatively upon him. In other words, “prove it” is a necessary and appropriate response.

Another consequence of a DUI arrest is an Illinois driver’s license suspension. If the arrest leads to a conviction, your driver’s license would be revoked.

The main difference between a suspension and a revocation stems from the fact that after being revoked you must go back and ask the Secretary of State to return your driver’s license to you. If you are only suspended, your license will be returned to you without needing a hearing.

When it comes to the driver’s license hearing, it’s an entirely different ballgame. You have already been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Therefore, your conviction is assumed to be valid and to attend a hearing and claim you were not guilty of the DU is a losing strategy. That’s because you, as the applicant, carry the burden of proof. 92 Illinois Administrative Code §1001.430 a) The standard is clear and convincing evidence. 92 IAC §1001.400

Continue reading →

Published on: December 7, 2012

What effect does a previous reckless homicide have on a new DUI charge?

By Theodore Harvatin

Illinois has a reckless homicide law. 720 ILCS 5/9-3 In its simplest terms, reckless homicide involves doing something grossly dangerous and stupid that causes the death of another person, even if unintended. A classic case would be randomly firing a gun into a crowd.

The reckless homicide law formerly provided that “in cases involving reckless homicide, being under the influence of alcohol or any other drug or drugs at the time of the alleged violation shall be presumed to be evidence of a reckless act unless disproved by evidence to the contrary” In other words, if you were driving drunk and someone died in a crash, you were assumed to be guilty of reckless homicide.

A criminal offense is broken down into what are known as “elements’ of the crime. “Elements” means that if facts A and B are proven, the defendant is guilty of C.

The state has the burden of proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime. The problem with the reckless homicide law as pertains to drunk driving is that it required the defendant (the accused) to disprove one of the elements, namely, that his conduct was reckless. This improperly shifted the burden of proof to the defendant and is unconstitutional. People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 784 N.E.2d 784, 271 Ill. Dec. 230 (2003)

In response to this, the DUI law was changed. Today, there are various offenses that fall under the category of “aggravated DUI”. 625 ILCS 11-501(d) Aggravated DUI is always a felony and in some circumstances, the penalties for that offense are enhanced beyond the maximums that would otherwise apply.

Thus, a driver is guilty of aggravated DUI if, in committing the offense of DUI (Driving Under the Influence), the driver was involved in an accident that resulted in the death of another person, so long as the act of driving under the influence was the “proximate cause” of the death. The prosecutor is required to prove that the act of driving under the influence caused the death, which renders the law constitutional. People v. Winningham, 391 Ill.App.3d 476 (4th Dist. 2009)

Another aggravated DUI circumstance arises if the driver committed DUI and had been previously convicted of reckless homicide in the operation of a motor vehicle. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d) A person in that situation is guilty of a felony.

Continue reading →

Published on: November 30, 2012

If marijuana ever becomes legal in Illinois, would it be legal to drive high?

By Theodore Harvatin

Illinois, as is the case with most states and the federal government, makes it illegal to possess marijuana. A few states recognize medicinal marijuana, which can be used with a prescription.

A couple of states recently decriminalized (made legal) marijuana use. A topic for another time is how those states will square their laws with the fact that marijuana possession remains a federal offense should the Federal Government choose to press charges.

That aside, driving under the influence (DUI) is illegal in all 50 states, including Illinois. 625 ILCS 5/11-501 While the term used is “driving” under the influence, the specific law makes it illegal, while “under the influence”, to drive or to be in “actual physical control” of a “vehicle” anywhere within the State of Illinois.

A “vehicle” includes any device upon which property or person may be transported, excluding human-powered devices. 625 ILCS 5/1-217 Therefore, it is not illegal to operate a bicycle while under the influence. People v. Schaefer, 274 Ill. App. 3d 450, 210 Ill. Dec. 968, 654 N.E.2d 267 (2 Dist. 1995) An ATV is, however, covered, even though you are not required to have a driver’s license or license plate to operate one.

“Under the influence” does not require the State to prove you were “drunk, intoxicated, buzzed” etc. Rather, a person is under the influence of alcohol when, as a result of drinking any amount of alcohol, his mental or physical faculties are so impaired as to reduce his ability to think and act with ordinary care IPI (Criminal) 23.29 In essence, you may convicted of DUI based upon nothing beyond proof that alcohol reduced your ability to think and act normally.

You may also be convicted of DUI in a way that does not require proof of actual impairment. If the state can show through chemical testing that your blood alcohol level at the time you were driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle was .08 or higher, you are just as guilty as though the State had proven your ability to drive was impaired due to alcohol.

In these blood-alcohol level type of cases, the defense must attempt to attack the manner in which the test was administered or assail its general reliability to prove accurate results, or otherwise show a judge or jury that the police engaged in other irregularities that tainted the evidence or that violated your Constitutional rights. While evidence of your apparent intoxicated or sober state are not required in this type of prosecution, such evidence can either support or erode the jury’s confidence in the chemical test results that the state proffers as proof of your being .08 or above.

Continue reading →

Published on: November 23, 2012

Illinois lawmakers introduce driver’s license legislation

By Theodore Harvatin

In the State of Illinois, the General Assembly is the legislative body that makes laws. The General Assembly consists of a Senate whose members number 59 and a House of Representatives made up of 118 members.

At various points throughout the legislative session, the members introduce proposed laws, which are known as “bills”. They are not effective as laws until they pass various levels of review, such as committees set up by each body.

Every state requires its drivers, subject to narrow exceptions, to obtain a valid driver’s license. 625 ILCS 5/6-101 There are of course age and residency requirements. Furthermore, an applicant for a driver’s must provide proper identification.

Those who are unable to provide such identity papers often include undocumented immigrants. If they are arrested and charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI), they may be convicted of a felony. 625 ILCS 11-501(d)(1)(H) for receiving a DUI at a time they did not hold a valid driver’s license. This is known as aggravated DUI.

In addition to the felony angle and even if the prosecutor decides not to pursue a felony conviction, there are unfavorable driver’s license consequences that flow from a conviction for driving without a valid license. A new suspension is added to your record. Furthermore, the length of the original suspension is doubled. 625 ILCS 5/6-303
At some point, repeated convictions for driving suspended will cause the Secretary of State to revoke your license. Once your license is revoked, you must have a Secretary of State driver’s license hearing. Meanwhile, another year gets added to the revocation.

But for someone who cannot provide identity documentation, such a hearing is futile. Therefore, those persons wind up in a vicious circle of what some have termed repeated but necessary criminal conduct (driving without a license, driving revoked etc in order to support your family).

Two Illinois lawmakers have introduced a bill, House Bill 6228. This bill generally provides an avenue for individuals to obtain a “driver’s certificate”. The certificate allows the holder to operate a motor vehicle in Illinois and subjects him to all the traffic laws and rules, just as is the case with any other driver.

Continue reading →

Published on: November 16, 2012

Is there a shortcut to avoid the driver’s license reinstatement process in Illinois?

By Theodore Harvatin

In Illinois, a conviction for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) requires the Illinois Secretary of State to revoke your driver’s license. When your license is revoked, the Secretary of State takes away your physical driver’s license and also cancels your right to operate a motor vehicle on the public roadways of Illinois. 625 ILCS 5/6-205
Therefore, even if you have a license in your possession, whether one issued by Illinois or any other state, you are not entitled to drive in Illinois. Because of your revoked status, you must apply to the Secretary of State for a new license by going through the driver’s license reinstatement process.

There is a waiting period before you are allowed to make application for the license. Keeping in mind that supervision is not a conviction, a first conviction carries with it a waiting period of one year.

A second conviction within 20 years of the first one results in a 5-year wait. You will have to wait 10 years following a third conviction. Your wait will be forever if you have 4 convictions, any one of which results from an arrest that occurred after January 1, 1999. 625 ILCS 5/6-208
Unless you are in the fourth arrest situation, you may be entitled to apply for a restricted driving permit (RDP) during the waiting period. The rules on how soon you may apply for an RDP are somewhat complex, but the time period will range anywhere from as few as 30 days to as many as 3 years. For the most part, two factors control, the first being how much time has elapsed between your DUI offenses and the second being whether or not you submit to a blood or breath test at the time of your most recent offense.

Whether you are applying for reinstatement or an RDP, any relief after a DUI revocation requires that Secretary of State driver’s license hearing. In that connection, there are many issues to negotiate.

These include determining the type of hearing (formal or informal), where to obtain a drug and alcohol evaluation, the types of classes to take, the number of hours to complete, the support program, if any, the length of abstinence required, if any, and the paperwork to submit in order to show the Secretary of State that you have done, and are doing, what is required of you. After getting all of these materials together, you then must present your case at an administrative hearing.

Some have devised strategies that they think will get around all of the above. One is to drive anyway. A sufficient number of convictions for driving revoked will eventually grow into a felony, with mandatory minimum prison terms and no probation. In addition, each conviction adds another year to the revocation. 625 ILCS 5/6-303

Continue reading →

Published on: November 9, 2012

Why are some DUI cases dismissed?

By Theodore Harvatin

There are approximately 40,000 Illinois DUI arrests each year. And that is just one state.

Over the course of an entire year, in the nation as a whole, there must be hundreds of thousands of such arrests. In fact, we personally represent many Illinois residents who have been convicted of a DUI while driving in another state and who, because of the conviction, lose their Illinois driving privileges, as provided for by law. 625 ILCS 5/6-206(a)(6) and 6-203.1
Yet whenever a well-known or prominent individual receives a favorable DUI outcome, a segment of the population, despite not knowing all the facts, cries “foul”! Many do not appreciate the fact that while there may be a rare number of cases in which “the fix is in”, the more probable explanation in the vast majority of dismissals is that the person had effective legal representation, coupled with factual and or legal deficiencies in the prosecutor’s case that the attorney was able to exploit.

If celebrity and clout were the ticket to getting away with DUI, the likes of Lindsey Lohan, Mel Gibson and Bobby Brown would not have been convicted. A recent situation in Washington State is instructive.

A judge was arrested for DUI. One thing to mention is that county prosecutor, whose office appears before the judge, removed himself from the case to avoid potential conflicts of interest. An outside lawyer who does not have contact with this judge’s court system, reviewed the evidence. Based upon that remove, he submitted a written report explaining in detail why he declined to prosecute the judge.

One means of attacking a DUI arrest is that the officer had no reasonable basis to initiate the stop. Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1, 20 L.Ed. 2d 889 (1968) In that regard, the police were on solid grounds. The officer observed the vehicle weaving for a substantial distance, the driver failed to signal lane changes and the vehicle was traveling well above the posted speed limit. All of these constitute traffic code violations. Even if the driver in fact was not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of committing these offenses, the arresting officer had a reasonable basis to believe the driver had violated the law.

The next step in the process is to determine whether the officer could escalate a simple traffic stop into a DUI offense? The police cannot pull you over for a traffic ticket and then immediately start investigating you for DUI.

Continue reading →

Published on: November 2, 2012

What is the difference in Illinois between a suspended and revoked driver’s license?

By Theodore Harvatin

Suppose you are arrested for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in Illinois. Such an arrest typically involves a criminal charge.

If you are convicted, you face the possibility of being fined, sentenced to probation or jail, ordered to attend alcohol classes and a MADD panel, required to wear an ankle bracelet and subjected to other punishments that can arise from a criminal case. DUI is a Class-A misdemeanor, which is a crime. 625 ILCS 5/111-501
There is also a noncriminal aspect to the DUI arrest, namely, negative action taken against your driver’s license. This is known as an “administrative sanction”.

A driver’s license suspension or revocation may seem like punishment, but a driver’s license is a privilege and not a right and furthermore, administrative sanctions do not include jail or fines. Therefore, taking away your driver’s license is not considered criminal in nature.

You may experience driver’s license sanctions arising from a DUI arrest that include a suspension or a revocation or both. A suspension creates a temporary hold on your right to drive for a specific period of time. After that time period ends, your suspension is over once you pay a reinstatement fee. 625 ILCS 5/1-204
A driver’s license revocation is also for a given period of time. But unlike a suspension, a revocation ends your right to drive, rather than just putting it on hold.

After the revocation time is over, your right to drive is not restored automatically. You must request driving privileges by having a driver’s license hearing with the Illinois Secretary of State. 625 ILCS 5/1-176
A successful driver’s license hearing requires that you provide a drug and alcohol evaluation, complete classes and if your classification is high risk dependent (alcoholics) stop drinking for at least 12 months and develop a support program, either Alcoholics Anonymous or a nontraditional program. There may be a fee for the hearing. Even if you win, you may be required to install, at your expense, a Breath Alcohol Interlock Ignition Device (BAIID). Finally, you will be required to pay a reinstatement fee.

Fees, evaluations, classes, breath machines etc. may sound like punishment. They are not considered punishment because the law does not force you to apply for your driver’s license.

A suspension arises from a DUI arrest based upon what happens when the police ask you to take a chemical test (breath or blood) during the arrest. If you register at least .08 on the chemical test or refuse to take it, the Secretary of State will suspend your driver’s license for anywhere from 6 months to 3 years. If you have gone more than 5 years without a DUI, the suspension is 6 months if you take the test and 12 months if you do not. You can apply for a driving permit during all but the first 30 days of the suspension. This is known as a Monitoring Device Driving Permit (MDDP) . 625 ILCS 5/6-208.1

Continue reading →

Published on: October 25, 2012

What might happen to Carlton Fisk?

By Theodore Harvatin

Carlton Fisk was one of the great major league baseball catchers to ever suit up. He played for the Boston Red Sox from 1969 to 1980 and for the Chicago White Sox until he retired in 1993.

In the 1975 World Series, cameras caught Fisk in probably the most iconic moment ever captured live in sports history, as he “English-ed’ his home run ball fair in the early morning hours of Game 6 of the 1975 World Series at Boston. Cameras then captured him jumping for joy, earning NBC an Emmy award.

Fisk has now been arrested in Illinois for a DUI. Early news reports indicate Fisk was passed out in a cornfield near New Lennox, seated in his truck, engine running, tire flat.

Police found an open vodka bottle in the passenger seat. Police charged Fisk with illegal transportation of alcohol (the open vodka bottle), contrary to 625 ILCS 5/11-502, as well as for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI) and improper lane usage (“weaving”).

After police awakened him, Fisk agreed to go to the hospital. However, once at the hospital, Fisk would not submit to a blood draw at the officer’s request.

In DUI cases involving an accident with injuries, there are typically two blood draws involved. When a person is transported to the hospital, the emergency room will normally draw blood in the normal course of treatment. This draw is important to the medical personnel treating the patient, as information about the contents and quantify of substances in a person’s blood stream is important in determining the diagnosis and treatment of any injuries
This draw is known as the “medical draw” because the blood is drawn for purposes of treatment. The results of the medical draw are admissible in a prosecution for DUI. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.4.

Such information can be used to prove actual impairment (drunk driving). The law presumes that someone with a blood alcohol level (BAL) of .08 or higher is under the influence, presumes that a BAL of .05 or less is evidence you are not impaired and creates no presumption when a BAL is greater than .05 but less than .08. Presumptions can be overcome with contrary evidence but the party with a favorable presumption has a leg up. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2
The medical draw may also be used to demonstrate that the accused either was or was not guilty of a “per se” violation of the DUI law. Under the “per se” analysis, the state does not have to prove that the defendant was actually impaired. The mere act of driving with a BAL of .08 or above is, in and of itself, illegally, even though there may be absolutely no evidence of impairment, such as unsteady balance, blood shot eyes, a strong odor of alcohol and bad driving indicative of impairment, such as weaving. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(1)

Continue reading →

Published on: October 19, 2012

Is there a statute of limitations for an old DUI?

By Theodore Harvatin

Someone who is arrested for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) may have questions about how long the DUI can be used against him. This issue can arise in several contexts but should not be confused with similar but different situations.

A statute of limitations as a defense to a DUI charge is limited to one specific situation. The state (police and or prosecutor) must, in charging any criminal offense, including DUI, allege in a written instrument the date of the claimed offense.

The charging instrument may be in the form of a traffic ticket (known as a complaint) issued by a police officer. The state may alternatively make the charge by bringing an “information”, a document filed by or on behalf of the state’s attorney. Or the charge may come through a grand jury indictment.

In all cases, the charge must be filed with the circuit clerk within a limited period of time after the incident date alleged in the information, indictment or complaint. For a misdemeanor DUI, that time period, which is known at the statute of limitations, is 18 moths. For a felony, it is 3 years. 720 ILCS 5/3-5
If a charge is filed within the above time frames, the statute of limitations is no longer a defense available to the accused (defendant). There may or may not be other defenses but not the statute of limitations.

Perhaps a charge is filed against you but takes a long time to resolve. Here the applicable time limit is the speedy trial act. 725 ILCS 5/103-5 In Illinois state court, if you are in custody (jail) and file a proper speedy trial demand, you must be brought to trial within 120 days. If you are not in custody, the state has 160 days to bring you to trial.

The tricky part of what seems like simple math is that any delay in bringing the defendant to trial that is attributable to the defendant does not count. So if you fail to show up for your trial date and the case is set to a later date, that delay does not count towards the speedy trial time. Or if you or your lawyer requests a continuance, or if you and the state agree to continue the case, the delay counts against you, not the state.

If the state requires a continuance, the delay counts in your favor, although if the state can present good cause for the delay (such as a witness that suddenly becomes unavailable), the judge may give additional time. People v. Exson, 896 N.E.2d 844, 384 Ill. App.3d 794 (1st Dist. 2008) A delay that works against the state is if the court system is not prepared, such as no available judges or jurors or courtrooms.

Continue reading →

Published on: October 12, 2012

If I lose my driver’s license, do I have to stop drinking and going to AA meetings to get the license back?

By Theodore Harvatin

One of the most devastating consequences of an Illinois conviction for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) is the loss of driving privileges that follows. By law, the Illinois Secretary of State is required to revoke your drivers’ license if you are convicted of DUI. 625 ILCS 5/6-205(a)(2) This can have an impact upon your job, your family and your self-esteem.

The revocation will be for at least one year. 625 ILCS 5/6-208(a) A one-year revocation applies if no other DUI convictions appear on your Illinois driving record.

If there is another DUI conviction within the previous 20 years, the new conviction will result in a revocation for 5 years. A third conviction, regardless of the time between offenses, results in a revocation for 10 years.

Four convictions will lead to a lifetime ban on any driving relief, even a restricted driving permit (hardship license) if any DUI arrest that led to a fourth (or greater) conviction occurred after January 1, 1999. 92 Illinois Administrative Code §§1001.420(o), 625 ILCS 5/6-208(b)4., 625 ILCS 5/6-205(c)(1), 6-206(c)3
Court supervision for DUI is not a conviction and will not be a factor in the above equations. Nor will DUI convictions that occurred in any other state, unless the state where the conviction occurred reported it to Illinois, unless it is your fourth or greater offense. Girard v. White, 356 Ill. App. 3d 11, 292 Ill. Dec. 376, 826 N.E.2d 517, (1 Dist. 2005)

A suspension and a revocation are not the same thing. A suspension is a temporary withdrawal of your driving privileges. Your license continues to exist; you just cannot use it during the suspension. However, once the suspension is over and you pay the reinstatement fee, you are allowed to drive, provided your license is otherwise valid.

In connection with DUI offenses, a suspension comes into play as a consequence of your either taking a chemical test (breath or blood) to determine your blood alcohol content (BAC) and registering a BAC at or above the legal limit of .08. Your license is also subject to a suspension if you decide not to take the chemical test.

The suspension is always longer if you do not test. The suspension is always longer if you have had a DUI in the previous five years (non first offender)

When the Secretary of State revokes your driver’s license, your privilege to drive ceases to exist. Restoration of those privileges is not, unlike a suspension, automatic. You must apply, after the revocation period of 1, 5 or 10 years ends, for driving privileges through an administrative hearing with the Secretary of State.

There is a common misconception that in order to obtain driving relief following a DUI revocation, you must stop drinking for at least a year and attend Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings. This is true in some instances but not universally so.

Continue reading →