Articles Posted in DUI

Published on:

By

A former Urbana (Champaign County) firefighter has been sentenced to jail. At the time of the offense, he was under a court ordered conditional discharge as a result of a previous conviction for driving under the influence (DUI).

In the state of Illinois, there is a law that makes it illegal to drive under the influence of alcohol, commonly referred to as DUI. The law in question provides in part as follows: “(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State while:
(1) the alcohol concentration in the person’s blood or breath is 0.08 or more based on the definition of blood and breath units in Section 11-501.2 [625 ILCS 5/11-501.2];
(2) under the influence of alcohol…” 625 ILCS 5/11-501
It is possible to be charged with non-alcohol DUI. For example, under Section 11-501, it is also illegal to drive while:
3) under the influence of any intoxicating compound or combination of intoxicating compounds to a degree that renders the person incapable of driving safely;
(4) under the influence of any other drug or combination of drugs to a degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving;
(5) under the combined influence of alcohol, other drug or drugs, or intoxicating compound or compounds to a degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving.

However, the majority of the DUI arrests and prosecutions in Illinois involve alcohol. With regard to alcohol, there are two types of DUI charges in Illinois.

You can be charged with driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2 Under these so-called “per se” prosecutions, the state need not prove that your ability to drive was actually impaired by alcohol. The mere fact you were driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater is a crime. People v. Ziltz 98 Ill.2d 38, 455 N.E.2d 70 (1983)

An alcohol-related DUI can also be based upon the fact, as stated in the Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions (IPI) that “A person is under the influence of alcohol when, as a result of drinking any amount of alcohol, his mental or physical faculties are so impaired as to reduce his ability to think and act with ordinary care” IPI (Criminal) 23.29 The state is not required to prove that you were “drunk” or “intoxicated” but simply that you were impaired to a degree to reduce your ability to think and act with ordinary care.

The firefighter was convicted of DUI in April 2010. He pled guilty. At that point, he was eligible for court supervision but did not receive it.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

In November 2011, a Will County man was arrested for DUI for the third time in less than 12 months. Laws in Illinois are created in two ways. The first is judge made law, known as “case law” because it is decided based upon specific cases.

The second type of law is known as “statutory law” or legislation. These are the rules (“legislation”) that are written by our elected representatives. In Illinois, this legislature is known as the Illinois General Assembly.

Relevant to this discussion is 625 ILCS 5/11-501, et. seq. the DUI statute, which reads in relevant part: (a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State while “under the influence of alcohol”. Many (incorrectly) refer to this as “drunk driving”.

Such a designation leaves one with the impression that DUI requires the state to demonstrate that you were highly intoxicated (“falling down drunk”). Instead, the state need only prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you were under the influence of alcohol.

This leads to the following jury instruction that defines for the jury what DUI means: “A person is under the influence of alcohol when, as a result of drinking any amount of alcohol, his mental or physical faculties are so impaired as to reduce his ability to think and act with ordinary care”. People v. Schneider, 362 Ill. 478, 200 N.E. 321 (1936); Illinois Pattern Instruction (Criminal) 23.29
As a result of his third DUI arrest, the Will County driver faces the following potential consequences: First, he could receive a felony conviction for aggravated DUI 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(1)(A) Assuming no additional aggravating factors, such as a transporting a child under the age of 16 years, death of one or more other persons, a BAC of .16 or greater, the offense is a Class 2 felony. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(2)(B) Such an offense is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or 3-7 years in the state penitentiary as stated in 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-35

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

A woman from Paris, Illinois, county seat of Edgar County, faces charges of aggravated DUI. In this tragic incident, the defendant (the accused) was allegedly driving south in the northbound lane when her vehicle struck an oncoming vehicle causing a crash. As a result of the crash, two passengers on the other vehicle are dead.

In the past, the driver would have been charge with reckless homicide arising from the operation of a motor vehicle. 720 ILCS 5/9-3(b) That law provided that if a person was under the influence of alcohol and was involved in a crash that resulted in death, he was automatically guilty of reckless homicide even without the state having to prove recklessness.

In the criminal law, the state has the burden of proving each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The Illinois Supreme Court ruled this law violated the Constitution by impermissibly requiring the defendant to prove that he was not reckless, rather than requiring the state to prove that he was. People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 784 N.E.2d 784, 271 Ill. Dec. 230 (2003)

The General Assembly has added the offense of aggravated DUI (625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)) “Aggravated” means “extreme” or “especially bad”. Aggravated DUI applies if, while you are operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, one or more people die and your impaired driving was a “proximate cause” of their death.. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(1)(F) Unlike the reckless homicide law that the Supreme Court held was unconstitutional, this law appears to be constitutional since it requires to state to prove that your impaired driving was the cause of the accident instead of assuming that you were reckless.

Aggravated DUI that results in death is a Class 4 felony punishable by a term of 3-14 years in prison, unless the court finds that “extraordinary circumstances exist” to require probation. However, if two or more persons die, the felony is upgraded to a Class 2 felony and the prison time becomes 6-28 years. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d((2)(G)

Continue reading →

By
Posted in: DUI
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

In 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its decision in People. v. Martin, 2011 IL 109102. The issue involved a fairly technical legal question known as “causation”.

Causation refers the notion that in the criminal law, a person is responsible for the outcome of an event only if the state is able to prove that something he did in an illegal manner caused the outcome. For instance, if your headlight is not operating properly and someone rear ends you, the state cannot say that you were the cause of the collision even though your car was not in proper working order. In other words, your non-functioning headlight, while illegal, was not in any manner responsible for your being hit from behind.

This idea came into play in the Martin because of the manner in which certain DUI laws are written. Under 625 ILCS 5/11-500, you can be charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in a number of ways.

One way is prove you were “under the influence” of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of the two. Another is to prove that you were driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater. A third is to show that you were under the influence of other intoxicants (huffing for instance).

One can make an argument that if your blood alcohol content is above .08, you are potentially a dangerous driver. The state should not be limited to proving your impairment by reference to your physical condition, actions and conduct at the time of the alleged offense.

Your blood alcohol content alone should be sufficient to show you ought not to have been driving. It would seem that since the purpose of the DUI laws is to keep dangerous drivers off the public roadway, this is a reasonable law.

However, there is one situation in which the state need merely show that you were operating your motor vehicle at a time you had any amount, no matter how small, of a prohibited drug in your system. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(6) Unlike alcohol, which leaves your system relatively quickly, some drugs remain in your body long after (sometime for weeks) you ingested them and well after their presence in your system would impact the mind and body in ways that could make you an unsafe driver.

Continue reading →

By
Posted in: DUI
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

A McClean County judge sentenced a Bloomington-Normal man to 20 years in prison following his 11th conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) In the State of Illinois, it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle on the public roadways while you are under the influence of alcohol. 625 ILCS 5/11-501
There is on one-size-fits-all answer to what the consequences of a DUI conviction are. In general, you would be looking at two separate issues, the criminal side of the DUI (fines, jail, probation) and the driver’s license consequences.

A first or second DUI conviction, absent death or serious injury, is a Class A misdemeanor. A Class-A misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of up to $2,500.00 and/or incarceration in the county jail for no more than 364 days. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-5.5
A third DUI violation is a Class 4 felony. As the number of DUI violations escalates, the potential punishment does as well. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d). After a sixth or more DUI conviction, you can be charged with a Class-X felony, with no probation and 6-30 years in prison and up to a $25,000 fine. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-25
Many DUI violations also require payment of fees relating to DUI prevention, victim compensation and other politically popular causes. The judge will probably also order you to obtain a drug and alcohol evaluation and complete the drink and driving classes (Driver Risk Education, “DRE”) and alcohol counseling.

You must obtain the evaluation from an agency licensed by the State of Illinois, Department of Human Services, Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse (DASA). DASA has rules as to the minimum number of hours you must complete, and the agency is allowed to increase those hours if it feels the need.

While the rules are somewhat arcane, in general, if you have no previous DUI arrests and you take a breath test and register under .15, your classification would be minimal risk, requiring you to complete a 10-hour DRE course. Title 77 Illinois Administrative Code §2060.101 and Title 92 Illinois Administrative Code §1001.10 and following.

Those same set of rules further provide if you refuse to take a test or register equal to or greater than .15 but less than .20 results and this is your first DUI offense, you must complete the 10-hour course and 12 hours of early intervention alcohol education. If you register .20 or higher and this is your first offense, you are what is known as significant risk and must take the DRE course and 20 hours of alcohol abuse treatment.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Illinois has a law against Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs. 625 ILCS 5/11-501 and following. Some people are surprised to learn that they can be arrested for DUI in Illinois even if they are involved in a crash in which they are the only ones injured.

There are several different types of DUI in Illinois. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a) provides as follows: (a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State while:
(1) the alcohol concentration in the person’s blood or breath is 0.08 or more based on the definition of blood and breath units in Section 11-501.2 [625 ILCS 5/11-501.2];
(2) under the influence of alcohol;
(3) under the influence of any intoxicating compound or combination of intoxicating compounds to a degree that renders the person incapable of driving safely;
(4) under the influence of any other drug or combination of drugs to a degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving;
(5) under the combined influence of alcohol, other drug or drugs, or intoxicating compound or compounds to a degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving; or
(6) there is any amount of a drug, substance, or compound in the person’s breath, blood, or urine resulting from the unlawful use or consumption of cannabis listed in the Cannabis Control Act [720 ILCS 550/1 et seq.], a controlled substance listed in the Illinois Controlled Substances Act [720 ILCS 570/100 et seq.], an intoxicating compound listed in the Use of Intoxicating Compounds Act [720 ILCS 690/0.01 et seq.], or methamphetamine as listed in the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act [720 ILCS 646/1 et seq.

Continue reading →

By
Posted in: DUI
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

On October 22, 2010, Brittney Rhea Butler was driving on Route 143 in Madison County, Illinois. The motor vehicle she was operating slammed into the rear of a vehicle that was stopped on the highway waiting to make a left turn.

In Butler’s 1985 Cadillac was a 35 year-old passenger, Jeffrey L. Davis of Edwardsville, Illiinois. While Butler suffered only minor injuries, Davis died.

There were no skid marks; police estimated the Butler vehicle was traveling 80 MPH. Butler’s blood alcohol level was .162. She was charged with aggravated Driving Under the Influence (DUI).

The legal limit for an Illinois DUI is .08. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2 The possible penalties and driver’s license sanctions for a first time DUI are up to 364 days in the county jail and/or a fine of up to $2,500.00 and a one year driver’s license revocation. 625 ILCS 5/11-501; 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55; 625 ILCS 5/6-208(b)(1)

Illinois has a DUI disposition known as court supervision. If a person is eligible for court supervision and if the judge sees fit to grant supervision, jail time cannot be imposed. In addition, since supervision is not a conviction, there will not be a driver’s license revocation. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1. (d)

However, Butler was charged with aggravated DUI and supervision was not an option. The DUI is considered “aggravated” because of the fatality. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(1)(F)

As a result of the aggravated nature of the offense, not only was supervision not an option, but since aggravated DUI is a felony, Butler faced from 3 to 14 years in the Illinois Department of Corrections (prison). Butler agreed to plead guilty.

In exchange for her guilty plea, prosecutors agreed to seek no more than 10 years in prison. The final sentence will be up to the judge.

In the opinion of this DUI lawyer, Butler is likely to receive 10 years. In determining an appropriate sentence, the judge is entitled to look at Butler’s criminal past.

At the time Butler committed this offense, she was on probation for two felony drug convictions from only year earlier. She also had a 2007 DUI arrest that was pled down to reckless driving.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

In Illinois, there are several consequences that flow from an arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI). The DUI statute, found at 625 ILCS 5/11-501, states, in part, that “(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State while:
(1) the alcohol concentration in the person’s blood or breath is 0.08 or more based on the definition of blood and breath units in Section 11-501.2;
(2) under the influence of alcohol”;
Therefore, you may be charged with DUI based upon the fact your blood alcohol level (BAL) was .08 or higher. The state is not required to prove that you seemed drunk (staggering, bloodshot eyes, etc).

Quite simply, it is illegal in Illinois to drive with more than .08% alcohol in your system. It is similar to speeding. The police do not have to show that your high speed made you a dangerous driver but simply that you were driving above the posted limit.

You may be tempted to conclude, if I never take the test, they cannot prove what my BAL was and therefore cannot convict me of driving with a BAL above .08. That strategy does carry with it some risks.

Refusing the test prevents the .08 prosecution, but it allows the state to argue you had a “guilty mind”. In other words, if you had nothing to hide, why didn’t you take the test? This could help the state convict you under the second definition of DUI, (part 2 above, “under the influence of alcohol”).

DUI under this section requires the state to prove that you were in fact impaired, since your refusal to submit to testing may be considered by the jury as evidence of a guilty mind 625 ILCS 6/11-501.2; P. v. Rolfingsmeyer, 101 Ill. 2d 137, 77 Ill. Dec. 787 (1984). By not submitting to testing, you forfeit the opportunity to show you were under the legal limit and you provide the state with an argument to use against you at trial.

Refusal of the test also carries with it driver’s license consequences in terms of the statutory summary suspension (SSS). The SSS law is found at 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1 and 625 ILCS 5/6-208 and 208.1

Continue reading →

By
Posted in: DUI
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

By

The University of Illinois is the flagship university in Illinois. The main campus is located in the twin cities of Urbana-Champaign, Champaign County. There are branch campuses in other cities, including Springfield, Illinois.

As a Big Ten university, the U of I has a football program. Being a university, it has young people. Young people drink, some of them drive. And some of them are charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI).

On July 30, 2011, one Ashante Williams, a U of I football player, was arrested for DUI in Urbana. It was reported that Williams was stopped at about 1:30 AM for improper lane usage and speeding. Williams did submit to a breath test, with a resulting blood alcohol level of .177. The legal blood alcohol level in Illinois is .08. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(1).

When a person who is arrested for DUI registers a blood alcohol level of .08 or higher, he has committed a “per se” violation of the DUI laws. This is a Latin term that essential translates into “automatic”.

The state does not have to prove that the driver was under the influence of alcohol (“drunk”) but simply that he was operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher. The Illinois Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the “per se” law. People v. Ziltz 98 Ill.2d 38, 455 N.E.2d 70 (1983)

Williams was granted court supervision for one year. Supervision is a sentence that prevents Williams from having his driver’s license revoked by the Secretary of State, the agency in Illinois that maintains driving records.

The judge imposed certain conditions on Williams (fines, alcohol classes, Victim Impact Panel sponsored by MADD), including that he not receive another traffic violation during the year his supervision is in effect. If Williams complies with all of the supervision requirements, although he pled guilty to DUI, he will not have a conviction entered on his record and the charges will be dismissed. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-3.1(e)

Continue reading →

Published on:

By

One of Mike Ditka’s sons, Mark Ditka, was arrested for DUI in Lake County Illinois. This follows closely on the heels of his brother Michael’s DUI arrest last month, his third. Some may recall their father Mike Ditka, former NFL football player, coach and television announcer, was arrested for DUI a few years ago, in the northern part of Illinois.

Michael has two previous DUI violations. Therefore, Illinois prosecutors have charged him with felony DUI in accordance with 625 ILCS 5/11-501 (d). Although his first offense may have resulted in court supervision, which is not a conviction, Michael faces a felony offense due to appellate court case law holding that any prior “violation”, including supervision, counts in determining whether there is a third violation. People v. Bloomberg, 378 Ill. App. 3d 686, 881 N.E.2d 615, 317 Ill. Dec. 447, (Ill. App. Ct. 2008)

Both Michael and Mark have pleaded not guilty. Since DUI is a criminal offense, the state has the burden of proving them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Shaffer, 134 Ill. App. 3d 548, 89 Ill. Dec. 709, 481 N.E.2d 61 (1 Dist. 1985)

On the other hand, Mark is eligible to receive court supervision. Court supervision is not a conviction. This is important because the Illinois Secretary of State will not revoke your license if you are not convicted of DUI. Therefore, you will not be required to attend a driver’s license hearing.

Continue reading →

By
Posted in: DUI
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information

We have provided effective advice and assistance to thousands of clients facing driver's license suspensions and revocations, both in Illinois and out-of-state, including students from area colleges and universities.

1100 S 5th St
Springfield, IL 62703
Phone: 217.525.0520 Fax: 217.525.0901

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2014 – 2025, Harvatin Law Offices P.C.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design