Articles Posted in DUI

In July 2011, a DuPage County man attempted to beat a train across the tracks. Unfortunately, it was a tie and his passenger died in the ensuing crash.

The driver, Jeffery Fisher of Carol Stream Illinois, survived the crash, which occurred at about 3:00 in the morning. Several hours later, Fisher’s registered a blood alcohol level of .15.

In Illinois, anyone who is in actual physical control of a motor vehicle upon the public highways with a blood alcohol level (BAL) of .08 or higher can be charged with Driving Under the Influence, or DUI. 625 ILCS 5/11-501. When the charge is based upon an excessive BAL, the state is not required to prove that the accused was actually impaired; the mere fact of the BAL is in and of itself a crime.

Typically, after a crash, the suspect offender may be unable to submit to standardized field sobriety tests (SFTS), as these involve physical activities such as the one-legged stand and the walk-and-turn (“walking a straight line”) challenges. Other commonly used evidence of alcohol impairment, such as bloodshot eyes, an odor of alcohol, difficulty with balance and slurred or mumbled speech, may also be unavailable due to injury.

Therefore, the BAL becomes a significant factor in proving evidence of a crime. Since you generally cannot be forced to submit to a breath test, it would seem that refusing would be the best course of action.

However, the law is set up to encourage you to submit. If you have not had a DUI arrest in the last five years and you submit to a test, your driver’s license will be suspended for 6 months if you register no less than .08, in accordance with 625 ILCS 5/11-500 and 625 ILCS 5/6-208.1 A refusal results in a 12 month suspension. In addition, at trial, the state is permitted to tell the jury that you refused and to argue that this is “evidence of a guilty mind”. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2; City of Rockford v. Elliott, 308 Ill. App. 3d 735, 721 N.E.2d 715, 242 Ill. Dec. 436 (1999)

If you have been arrested for DUI in the previous 5 years and submit to a test, your license will be suspended for one year and if you refuse, it will be suspended for 3 years. During none of these suspensions will you be allowed to apply for any type of driving privileges, including a restricted driving permit (RDP).

Continue reading →

A Springfield Illinois man was arrested and taken the Sangamon County jail following a crash. The driver was not injured but his passenger and the driver of an oncoming vehicle with which he collided were taken to the hospital due to injuries.

The driver was arrested for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI), a violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-501. He was also charged with improper lane usage, contrary to 625 ILCS 5/11-709.

This appears to be his first DUI charge, which is ordinarily a Class A misdemeanor, subject to a fine of no more than $2,500.00 and or up to 364 days in the county jail. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-5.5 Improper lane usage is a petty offense punishable by a fine only, not to exceed $500.00. 625 ILCS 5/6-601
However, the DUI law further provides: “(d) (1) Every person convicted of committing a violation of this [DUI] Section shall be guilty of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, other drug or drugs, or intoxicating compound or compounds, or any combination thereof if:
(C) the person in committing a violation of subsection (a) [DUI] was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in great bodily harm or permanent disability or disfigurement to another, when the violation was a proximate cause of the injuries”.

If convicted under this section, the person is guilty of a Class 4 felony, and if sentenced to prison, faces 1-12 years in the Department of Corrections. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(2)(A) and (d)(2)(F) This is known as “aggravated DUI” because it involves commission of a DUI with an additional aggravating (negative) circumstances, in this case, serious injury.

Illinois law provides for a disposition known as court supervision. If a person is granted supervision, he pleads guilty to the offense but no judgment of conviction is entered on his record. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1. (d); People v. Schuning, 106 Ill. 2d 41, 86 Ill. Dec. 922, 476 N.E.2d 423 (1985)

During the period of supervision, which cannot extend any longer than 2 years, the offender must comply with the conditions of supervision , which typically provide that he not violate the law, complete alcohol counseling and pay all fines. Provided that he complies with the terms of the court supervision, the judge will dismiss the case.

However, in a DUI situation, the supervision will be reported to the Secretary of State and remain on the driver’s record forever. 625 ILCS 5/6-204 DUI supervision cannot be expunged. 20 ILCS 2630/5.2.(3)(A) Finally, you may only receive supervision once in your lifetime. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1(d)

Continue reading →

A driver from O’Fallon, Illinois, located in St. Clair County, was arrested for DUI. He was also charged with driving on a suspended license due to an earlier DUI charge.

In the State of Illinois, it is illegal to drive while under the influence of alcohol. The law, or as it is known in Illinois, the statute, is part of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Chapter 625 of the Illinois Revised Statutes). The entire DUI statute is 625 ILCS 5/11-501. There are six subparts to the law.

The first two deal with driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a blood alcohol level of .08 or greater. The other four are concerned with DUI drugs, both illegal, including marijuana, and prescription medications, as well as other “intoxicants” (for instance, “huffing” paint fumes). 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(3)–(a)(6)

The driver was also charged with driving with a suspended license resulting from an earlier DUI arrest. There is a difference between a suspended or revoked license.

Your driver’s license is revoked from a DUI charge only if you are convicted of the DUI, which requires the state to prove you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Shaffer, 134 Ill. App. 3d 548, 89 Ill. Dec. 709, 481 N.E.2d 61 (1 Dist. 1985) Your license will be revoked for 1, 5 or 10 years, depending upon your prior record.

Should this be your first DUI conviction, you will be revoked for one year. If this is your second conviction within 20 years, your license will be revoked for 5 years. Three convictions, no matter when they occurred, leads to a revocation of your license for 10 years. 625 ILCS 5/6-208
During the time of your revocation, you may be eligible to apply for a restricted driving permit (RDP). This relief is available 30 days after a revocation following your first DUI conviction. If it is your second or third conviction, you may not apply for the RDP for one year. 625 ILCS 5/205(c)(3).

Even with all the above, you may not be eligible for an RDP if your statutory summary suspension (SSS) is in effect. The SSS and the DUI ticket are different processes.

The SSS only applies to your driving privileges and does not require the state to prove you were under the influence. The state must simply show either that you took a breath test and registered .08 or higher, or elected not to take a breath test (“refusal’).

Continue reading →

A woman from Paris, Illinois, county seat of Edgar County, faces charges of aggravated DUI. In this tragic incident, the defendant (the accused) was allegedly driving south in the northbound lane when her vehicle struck an oncoming vehicle causing a crash. As a result of the crash, two passengers on the other vehicle are dead.

In the past, the driver would have been charge with reckless homicide arising from the operation of a motor vehicle. 720 ILCS 5/9-3(b) That law provided that if a person was under the influence of alcohol and was involved in a crash that resulted in death, he was automatically guilty of reckless homicide even without the state having to prove recklessness.

In the criminal law, the state has the burden of proving each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The Illinois Supreme Court ruled this law violated the Constitution by impermissibly requiring the defendant to prove that he was not reckless, rather than requiring the state to prove that he was. People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 784 N.E.2d 784, 271 Ill. Dec. 230 (2003)

The General Assembly has added the offense of aggravated DUI (625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)) “Aggravated” means “extreme” or “especially bad”. Aggravated DUI applies if, while you are operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, one or more people die and your impaired driving was a “proximate cause” of their death.. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(1)(F) Unlike the reckless homicide law that the Supreme Court held was unconstitutional, this law appears to be constitutional since it requires to state to prove that your impaired driving was the cause of the accident instead of assuming that you were reckless.

Aggravated DUI that results in death is a Class 4 felony punishable by a term of 3-14 years in prison, unless the court finds that “extraordinary circumstances exist” to require probation. However, if two or more persons die, the felony is upgraded to a Class 2 felony and the prison time becomes 6-28 years. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d((2)(G)

Continue reading →

In 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its decision in People. v. Martin, 2011 IL 109102. The issue involved a fairly technical legal question known as “causation”.

Causation refers the notion that in the criminal law, a person is responsible for the outcome of an event only if the state is able to prove that something he did in an illegal manner caused the outcome. For instance, if your headlight is not operating properly and someone rear ends you, the state cannot say that you were the cause of the collision even though your car was not in proper working order. In other words, your non-functioning headlight, while illegal, was not in any manner responsible for your being hit from behind.

This idea came into play in the Martin because of the manner in which certain DUI laws are written. Under 625 ILCS 5/11-500, you can be charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in a number of ways.

One way is prove you were “under the influence” of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of the two. Another is to prove that you were driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater. A third is to show that you were under the influence of other intoxicants (huffing for instance).

One can make an argument that if your blood alcohol content is above .08, you are potentially a dangerous driver. The state should not be limited to proving your impairment by reference to your physical condition, actions and conduct at the time of the alleged offense.

Your blood alcohol content alone should be sufficient to show you ought not to have been driving. It would seem that since the purpose of the DUI laws is to keep dangerous drivers off the public roadway, this is a reasonable law.

However, there is one situation in which the state need merely show that you were operating your motor vehicle at a time you had any amount, no matter how small, of a prohibited drug in your system. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(6) Unlike alcohol, which leaves your system relatively quickly, some drugs remain in your body long after (sometime for weeks) you ingested them and well after their presence in your system would impact the mind and body in ways that could make you an unsafe driver.

Continue reading →