Articles Posted in DUI

When a driver in Illinois has an encounter with law enforcement while the driver is in actual physical control of a motor vehicle as required by Illinois DUI (Driving Under the influence) law (625 ILCS 5/11-501), the officer may be looking for signs of DUI impairment. This can begin with the initial driving behavior. Common markers of alcohol-related driving behavior include driving too slowly, wide turns and weaving.

This will provide the reasonable suspicion the officer needs to stop the driver. Terry v. Ohio 392 US 1, 20 L.Ed. 2d 889 (1968) The police will also observe the manner in which the driver executes the stop. This includes matters such as how quickly the driver notices the flashing lights and slows, how the driver performs while engaged in pulling over (using turn signal for instance) and how effectively the driver stops and parks the vehicle.

Next, the officer will have an opportunity to observe the driver face-to-face. Signs of impairment would be slurred, thick tongued speech, bloodshot and glassy eyes, heavy eyelids and an odor of alcohol. An officer will also note any difficulty the driver encounters in retrieving the driver’s license, insurance card and registration.

Continue reading →

The United States postmaster assigned to Springfield Illinois was arrested for Driving Under the Influence (DUI). DUI arrests typically follows a similar pattern.

At the time of any traffic stop, the officer will be looking for signs of impaired driving. One of the early indicators of impaired driving involves the nature of the traffic offense. Studies have shown that driving too slowly, weaving and making wide turns are some of the most common indications of alcohol impairment that result in a DUI arrest.

Another phase in the analysis comes about during the initial face-to-face contact. At that juncture, the officer may notice slurred speech, bloodshot watery eyes and confusion. The driver may be disoriented as to destination, location, date and time.

As in any traffic stop, the officer will request a driver’s license, registration and proof of insurance. Difficulty locating and producing these items (fumbling, dropping, producing the wrong thing) will be scored against the driver.

No doubt the officer will eventually ask about alcohol consumption. Rather than asking if the driver has been drinking, the officer will ordinarily ask a more leading question, how much have you had to drink tonight? Most commonly the answer is a couple or nothing. A denial of any alcohol consumption will bring out a skeptical response from the police, such as, are you sure, I can smell it on your breath?

Continue reading →

Many arrests in Illinois for Driving Under the Influence (DUI)are recorded by a camera affixed to the dash of the officer’s squad car. In fact, Illinois State Police are required to record all DUI arrests and preserve the video. However, court cases have stated that there are no consequences for the failure of the Illinois State Police to record an arrest.

In the case of People v. Kladis, 2011 IL 110920, 960 N.E.2d 1104, 355 Ill. Dec. 933, the Illinois Supreme Court addressed the consequences of the state failing to preserve a video even though the defense lawyer made a timely request for its preservation.

Five days after her arrest and 25 days prior to the first appearance, Defendant filed a Petition to Rescind the SSS and also served on the state a notice pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 237 (b) requesting production of all in-custody videotapes. At the first appearance, the videotape was not present.

The arresting officer testified that he had activated his dash camera prior to making the stop and described what the camera captured, namely, the substance of the arrest. The hearing was continued to a later date but not before defense counsel requested discovery pursuant to People v. Schmidt, 56 Ill.2d 572, 309 N.E.2d 557 (1974).

When the parties returned to court at the later date, the state advised the court that the video had been destroyed only hours prior to the first appearance, in accordance with departmental policy. The state did not dispute that it had received defendant’s Rule 237 notice prior to destruction of the video.

Continue reading →

Court supervision in Illinois is a valuable tool. For example, a conviction for Driving Under the Influence, or DUI, requires the Illinois Secretary of State to revoke your driver’s license, which is more severe than a driver’s license suspension. 625 ILCS 5/6-205

Unlike a driver’s license suspension, which ends automatically, restoration of driving privileges following a driver’s license revocation requires an administrative hearing with the Illinois Secretary of State. Such a hearing entails obtaining a drug and alcohol evaluation, possibly completing a 10-hour driver risk education course, as well as anywhere from 20 to 75 hours of alcohol counseling.

Furthermore, if you are high risk dependent (alcoholic), you will be required to stop drinking for at least a year before being eligible for driving relief. In addition, you must demonstrate to the Secretary of State that you have developed a support program to help you remain completely alcohol free for the remainder of your life.

Those who are dependent must also, through testimony or letters, prove from at least three independent sources their claim that they have not consumed alcohol for at least 12 consecutive months before the hearing. Similarly, they must provide letters or testimony from at least three members of their support group to explain their participation in the support program. Continue reading →

Driving Under the Influence (DUI, DWI, drunk driving) in Illinois is illegal under several different scenarios. You can be charged with organic DUI, or in other words, DUI based upon proof of alcohol impairment. This is shown by the police officer’s observation of your actions and conduct from the moment you are stopped to the time he releases you at the jail.

These garden variety observations for signs of a possible Illinois DUI arrest include how to conduct yourself leading up to the stop. Covered here would be how quickly you pulled over, your maneuvers while pulling over and your parking.

The officer would also observe your performance before exiting the vehicle. Here the police would be looking for any difficulties in retrieving your drivers’ license, insurance card and registration. It would extend to your ability to follow his instructions, to engage in a cogent conversation and to understand your location and surroundings. Finally, your speech, the condition of your eyes and your general physical appearance would come into play.

The next step in the observations is the so-called exit sequence. That would cover things such as any assistance you required in stepping out of the vehicle and in walking to the squad car. Moreover the officer would take your balance and coordination into account.

Continue reading →

The Illinois DUI law does not say that you must be “driving” a motor vehicle to be charged with DUI. The law reads in part: “A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State while” (under the influence).

One issue involves what is a “vehicle”. Keep in mind, the law does not limit the offense to something that requires a license to drive or that requires having a license plate.

Any device or implement for transporting human beings, other than human powered devices and snowmobiles, is a “vehicle” (625 ILCS 5/1-217) As such, it is illegal to operate that device while under the influence. This includes tractors, riding lawn mowers, moped and ATV’s. 296 People v. Martinez, 296 Ill. App. 3d 330, 694 N.E.2d 1084, 230 Ill. Dec. 806, 1998 WL 229582 (1998) However, a bicycle, being human-powered, is not a “vehicle” and therefore not subject to the DUI laws. Standard Mut. Ins. Co. v. Rogers, 381 Ill. App. 3d 196, 884 N.E.2d 845, 318 Ill. Dec. 877, 2008 WL 795294 (2008)

Another aspect of the offense of DUI (Driving Under the Influence) involves where and when it is illegal. In that connection, the law makes it illegal to drive under the influence “within this State”. Given this language, Illinois courts have held that DUI is a crime even if committed on private property. People v. Bailey, 243 Ill. App. 3d 871, 612 N.E.2d 960, 184 Ill. Dec. 84, 1993 WL 127621 (1993)

Continue reading →